Professor Paul Connett : Your Toxic Tap Water
Dr. Paul Connett, Professor of Chemistry at St. Lawrence University in New York, gives a damning interview on the history of water fluoridation, the collusion of major industries to put certified toxic waste into your drinking water, and why government health authorities refuse to conduct scientific studies into the dangers of fluoridation. After watching this video, you will never look at tap water the same way again.
Connett describes how he initially thought people who opposed fluoridation were "a bunch of whackos," before conducting his own research which found that sodium fluoride was a toxic substance that contributed to a wide array of health defects. Heavy industry is barred from dumping this toxic waste into the sea by international law, but being able to sell it enables them to remove its hazardous characteristic and it becomes a product, explains Connett, polluting not only our water supply but also toothpaste and thousands of different foods.
Connett provides a detail run down of the many health problems caused by fluoride consumption, including dental fluorosis, which the Centers For Disease Control just recently announced was a problem for 41 per cent of children aged 12-15 in the United States, clearly indicating that children are being over-exposed to fluoride and that this is affecting other tissues and organs in the body, including bone disorders, a problem also wreaking havoc amongst adults in the United States as one in three now suffer from arthritis, which again is being caused by a build-up of toxic fluoride in the body. Connett also points to fluoride's connection with thyroid disorders.
There have now been over 100 studies involving animals which show that fluoride damages the brain, stresses Connett, which is a particular concern for newborn babies who are susceptible to fluoride build up because of their weak blood-brain barrier. Connett cites numerous studies which prove a link between moderate exposure to fluoride and lowered IQ in children.
Fluoride's impact on the pineal gland, which is a piece of brain tissue that sits in-between the two hemispheres of the brain, is key because fluoride attracts to this gland like a magnet. Researchers have found through animal studies that fluoride lowers the ability of the pineal gland to produce the hormone melatonin, which in turn shortens the time it takes to reach puberty, correlating with studies of fluoridated communities that show girls are on average menstruating 5 months earlier than those in non-fluoridated communities. Children are entering puberty at increasingly early stages and this is causing widespread concern, but health authorities have made no effort whatsoever to conduct any studies regarding this development and its link to fluoride.
http://prisonplanet.tv/
Friday, December 24, 2010
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
The Global Awakening - Alex Jones speech from Santa Cruz, CA
Alex Jones gives a speech live in Santa Cruz California about the global awakening, how we as a species can take back our power and ultimately live out our destiny as free human beings.
Monday, December 20, 2010
Alex Jones & Bob Chapman: A Scientific Eugenics Elite That Believe They're God!
Alex & Bob discuss the many faces and races that run the Nwo.
Corporate interests own Congress in order to write the laws that govern their industries. If they were not governed at all,which is the "free market" idea that conservatives like Jones spew, then they would do what they please. How can you say they would act lawfully when they are already making sure the laws made are in their favor? If they were ever doing "the right thing" then government would have never been involved. I've got plenty of historical accounts to prove this.
I think we agree completely on what the reality of the situation is, but I think we have different ideas about the solution, or maybe we actually agree. One reality is that if you're a successful business on a large scale and you aren't lobbying Congress, then you will get screwed, but most people who have found this out now have offices on K street. I also agree that laws should apply equally to all, but why are corporate interests lobbying Congress? To get an advantage.A lot of people assume that in a free market businesses would poison rivers and produce toxic products, but those things occur in the system we have specifically because Governmental departments allow them to, while simultaneously make progress more difficult for lobbyist-free businesses.
Commerce and property laws should be straightforward and apply to all equally - that's the essence of free market capitalism.
All that aside I think we agree on most aspects of the problem.
Large corporations are heavily subsidized and provided regulatory benefits, but if they grew without those (and without breaking laws) I see no reason why their business should be criticized.
I see a difference between laws and regulations - I suspect the term "regulation" is used simply because of the Constitutional allowance for Government to regulate interstate commerce.
They misuse their role and apply terms they feel alleviate acknowledgement of regulatory favoritism.And so there would only be a few very large corporations that would have a monopoly on the market. I was listening to Alex Jones right after I posted this comment. Part of the show was a recorded segment where he's talking to Gerald Celente. Jones is pissed that a Republican congressman said that Congress is there to be subservient to business and that banks should not be regulated. How is this not hypocritical? Alex wants government to regulate business
Corporate interests own Congress in order to write the laws that govern their industries. If they were not governed at all,which is the "free market" idea that conservatives like Jones spew, then they would do what they please. How can you say they would act lawfully when they are already making sure the laws made are in their favor? If they were ever doing "the right thing" then government would have never been involved. I've got plenty of historical accounts to prove this.
I think we agree completely on what the reality of the situation is, but I think we have different ideas about the solution, or maybe we actually agree. One reality is that if you're a successful business on a large scale and you aren't lobbying Congress, then you will get screwed, but most people who have found this out now have offices on K street. I also agree that laws should apply equally to all, but why are corporate interests lobbying Congress? To get an advantage.A lot of people assume that in a free market businesses would poison rivers and produce toxic products, but those things occur in the system we have specifically because Governmental departments allow them to, while simultaneously make progress more difficult for lobbyist-free businesses.
Commerce and property laws should be straightforward and apply to all equally - that's the essence of free market capitalism.
All that aside I think we agree on most aspects of the problem.
Large corporations are heavily subsidized and provided regulatory benefits, but if they grew without those (and without breaking laws) I see no reason why their business should be criticized.
I see a difference between laws and regulations - I suspect the term "regulation" is used simply because of the Constitutional allowance for Government to regulate interstate commerce.
They misuse their role and apply terms they feel alleviate acknowledgement of regulatory favoritism.And so there would only be a few very large corporations that would have a monopoly on the market. I was listening to Alex Jones right after I posted this comment. Part of the show was a recorded segment where he's talking to Gerald Celente. Jones is pissed that a Republican congressman said that Congress is there to be subservient to business and that banks should not be regulated. How is this not hypocritical? Alex wants government to regulate business
Wednesday, December 8, 2010
Wal-Mart Invasion Part of Larger DHS Takeover of America
http://www.prisonplanet.com/big-sis-i...
WASHINGTON — Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano today announced the expansion of the Department's national "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign to hundreds of Walmart stores across the country—launching a new partnership between DHS and Walmart to help the American public play an active role in ensuring the safety and security of our nation.
WASHINGTON — Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Janet Napolitano today announced the expansion of the Department's national "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign to hundreds of Walmart stores across the country—launching a new partnership between DHS and Walmart to help the American public play an active role in ensuring the safety and security of our nation.
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
Wayne Madsen: The WikiLeaks Case & Senate Passes S510! - Alex Jones Tv
Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen talks about the WikiLeaks case. Alex also talks about the latest developments in the WikiLeaks case and the collapsing economy. He also takes your calls.
www.waynemadsenreport.com
www.waynemadsenreport.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)